← Main Page Análisis Graham Buffett Sowell Metodología About
ORCL · NYSE

Oracle Corporation

Enterprise Cloud/Database Software · July 19, 2026
$126.41
Market Cap $364.1B · P/E 21.7x
SPECULATIVE BUY — Consumer monopoly with 19% projected return. Massive $156B leveraged AI bet creates execution risk. Buffett likes growth but Graham warns on debt.
$5.83
EPS (FY2026)
24.7%
EPS CAGR (4yr)
65.8%
Gross Margin
40.0%
ROE
-$23.7B
FCF (FY2026)
5.48x
Int. Coverage
Decision Matrix
Buffett
Graham
Sowell

Framework Convergence

4/12
Graham Score
9/14
Buffett Score
+7
Sowell Score
SPEC. BUY
Combined Signal
Framework
Signal
Key Factor
Implication
Graham
SPEC.
P/E 38.2x avg (max 20x)
MoS: -206%
Buffett
HOLD/BUY
19% projected but $156B debt
IV: $178
Sowell
NEUTRAL+
Natural monopoly, debt fragility
+7 net

Reasoning Chain

How Each Framework Contributed

📐 Graham: 10-year avg EPS ($3.31) × 20x = $66.10 max. Current price $126 is 91% above max investment. 8 of 12 tests FAIL. Debt payoff 9.2 years catastrophically exceeds 4yr max.

🎯 Buffett: Projects EPS at 20% CAGR → $36.10 in 10yr. At 20x P/E → $722. Return from $126 = 19%/yr (PASSES). BUT: $156B debt, 328% CAPEX/Earnings, BBB- rating violate conservative principles.

🌐 Sowell: Natural monopoly in enterprise databases confirmed. Passes cost pass-through test. Zero subsidy dependency. BUT: credit market dependency ($156B debt) introduces systemic fragility.

🔍 Synthesis: Buffett says BUY (19% return). Graham says SPECULATION (extreme debt). Sowell says NEUTRAL with bullish bias. Combined = SPECULATIVE BUY for investors who accept leverage risk and believe AI thesis materializes.

Action Levels

$126.41
Current Price
≤$178
Buffett Intrinsic Value
≤$66.10
Graham Max Invest.
+29.2%
Margin of Safety

Actionable Signals

Signal
Result
Condition
Action
STRONG BUY
≤$89
50% of IV
Aggressive accumulation
BUY ZONE
$89–$178
Below IV (CURRENT)
Standard building
HOLD
$178–$232
At/above IV
Hold, no new buying
OVERVALUED
>$232
>130% IV
Consider trimming

Price Thermometer

Multi-Framework Price Zones

STRONG BUY ≤$89BUY ≤$178HOLD ≤$232OVERVALUED $232+

Bull Case

  • Projected 19% annual return exceeds 15% threshold
  • $638B RPO backlog provides multi-year revenue visibility
  • OCI growing 93% — AI infrastructure demand explosion
  • Natural monopoly in enterprise databases (high switching costs)
  • Larry Ellison 42% ownership — maximum skin in the game

Bear Case

  • $156B debt — S&P downgraded to BBB- (near junk)
  • CAPEX 328% of earnings — capital intensity extreme
  • Negative FCF (-$23.7B) — dividends funded by debt
  • Gross margin compressed 79%→66% from business model shift
  • AI overcapacity risk if demand disappoints
  • Stock crashed 64% from ATH — market repricing risk

Intrinsic Value Calculation

Buffett Valuation Method

STRONG BUY ≤$89BUY $89-$178 (HERE)HOLD $178-$232OVERVALUED $232+
Step 1: Current EPS = $5.83 (FY2026 10-K)
Step 2: Conservative Forward CAGR = 20%
Step 3: Future EPS in 10 years: $5.83 × (1.20)^10 = $36.10
Step 4: Future Stock Price = $36.10 × 20 = $721.96
Step 5: Intrinsic Value = $721.96 ÷ (1.15)^10 = $178.46
Step 6: Margin of Safety = +29.2%
Step 7: Projected Return = 19.0% ≥ 15% ✓

Durable Competitive Advantage

Consumer Monopoly Assessment

YES
Consumer Monopoly
24.7%
EPS CAGR (4yr)
40.0%
ROE
$638B
RPO Backlog

Oracle Database dominates enterprise relational databases with extreme switching costs (migration takes 12-24+ months). Fusion ERP/HCM deeply embedded in Fortune 500 operations. OCI grew 93% in Q4 FY2026. $638B RPO = committed multi-year revenue.

Earnings Record

Year
EPS
Net Income
Revenue
FY2022
$2.41
$6.7B
$42.4B
FY2023
$3.07
$8.5B
$50.0B
FY2024
$3.71
$10.5B
$53.0B
FY2025
$4.34
$12.4B
$57.4B
FY2026
$5.83
$17.0B
$67.4B

Buffett Scorecard

Test
Result
Value
Threshold
Gross Profit Margin
PASS
65.8%
>40%
SGA/GP Ratio
PASS
22.4%
<30%
Depreciation/GP
PASS
21.0%
<25%
Interest/Operating Inc
FAIL
22.3%
<10%
Earnings Predictability
PASS
Uptrend
Consistent
ROE
PASS
40.0%
>15%
Debt Payoff
FAIL
9.2 years
<4 years
CAPEX/Earnings
FAIL
328%
<50%
EPS CAGR (4yr)
PASS
24.7%
>15%
P/E Ratio
PASS
21.7x
<40
D/E Ratio
FAIL
5.14x
<0.80
Projected Return
PASS
19.0%
>15%
Consumer Monopoly
PASS
Yes
Required
EPS CAGR (9yr)
FAIL
11.2%
>15%

Why You SHOULD Invest

  • 19% projected return exceeds 15% threshold
  • $638B backlog — unprecedented revenue visibility
  • OCI growing 93% — massive AI demand
  • Natural monopoly in databases with 95%+ retention
  • 42% founder ownership — aligned incentives

Why You SHOULDN'T Invest

  • $156B debt — 9.2 years to repay from earnings
  • CAPEX 328% of earnings — cash machine becomes cash burner
  • BBB- credit rating — one notch above junk
  • Negative FCF — dividends funded by new debt
  • Gross margin compressed 13pp in 4 years

Intrinsic Value Calculation

Graham Normal Value Method

BARGAIN ≤$28NORMAL $41MAX INVEST $66OVERVALUED $66+
Step 1: 10-Year Average EPS = $3.31
Step 2: Normal Value = $3.31 × 12.5 = $41.31
Step 3: Bargain Price = $41.31 × 0.667 = $27.54
Step 4: Max Investment Price = $3.31 × 20 = $66.10
Step 5: Current Price = $126.41
Step 6: Margin of Safety = -206.0% (NEGATIVE)

Earning Power Analysis

Year
EPS
Net Income
Revenue
Growth
FY2022
$2.41
$6.7B
$42.4B
FY2023
$3.07
$8.5B
$50.0B
+27%
FY2024
$3.71
$10.5B
$53.0B
+21%
FY2025
$4.34
$12.4B
$57.4B
+17%
FY2026
$5.83
$17.0B
$67.4B
+34%

Income Statement Metrics

65.8%
Gross Margin
30.6%
Operating Margin
25.2%
Net Margin
5.48x
Interest Coverage

Balance Sheet Metrics

$14.59
Book Value/Share
-$6.78
Tangible BV/Share
-$59.77
NCAV/Share
8.7x
Price/Book

Graham Scorecard

Test
Result
Value
Graham Standard
P/E vs. 10yr Avg Earnings
FAIL
38.2x
≤ 20x
Earnings Stability
FAIL
25.7%
≥ 50%
Earnings Trend
PASS
Upward
Stable/Up
Interest Coverage
PASS
5.48x
≥ 3x
Current Ratio
FAIL
1.12:1
≥ 2:1
LT Debt Payoff
FAIL
9.2 yrs
≤ 4 years
Book Value vs Price
FAIL
8.7x Book
Price < Book
NCAV vs Price
FAIL
Negative
NCA > Price
Dividend Record
PASS
13 years
≥ 10 years
Revenue Stability
PASS
No >33% decline
< 33%
Margin of Safety
FAIL
-206%
≥ 33%
Financial Structure
FAIL
Speculative
Conservative

Sowell Verdict

NEUTRAL (Bullish Bias) — Net Score: +7

"Oracle's CORE BUSINESS is everything Sowell admires: a natural monopoly operating efficiently. However, the FINANCING STRATEGY introduces exactly the kind of systemic fragility Sowell warns about: dependence on credit markets that can freeze."

Weighted Phases Scorecard

Phase
Signal
Weight
Detail
Pass-Through Test
BULLISH
HEAVY (2×)
All competitors face same GPU/energy costs
Natural vs Artificial Monopoly
BULLISH
HEAVY (2×)
Natural — database dominance from innovation
Subsidy Dependency
BULLISH
HEAVY (2×)
Zero dependency — profits from real demand
Geographic Diversification
BULLISH
Standard (1×)
Americas 60%, EMEA 25%, APAC 15%
Management Alignment
BULLISH
Standard (1×)
42% Ellison ownership — maximum skin
Scale Economics
BULLISH
Standard (1×)
Software in scale; infra building
Innovation Pressure
BULLISH
Standard (1×)
Forced by AWS/Azure competition
Credit/Systemic Risk
BEARISH
Standard (1×)
BBB- rating, $156B debt dependency
Interest Rate Sensitivity
BEARISH
Standard (1×)
Extreme — bond yields at 7.75%
AI Overcapacity Risk
BEARISH
Standard (1×)
All hyperscalers building simultaneously

Scarce Resources Analysis

Resource
% Cost
Trend
Substitutes
Risk
GPU/AI Accelerators
~25-30%
Rising sharply
Limited (AMD, custom)
High
Electrical Power
~15-20%
Rising
Nuclear, renewables
Medium
Engineering Talent
~20%
Rising
Offshore (quality trade-off)
High
Capital (Debt)
~7%
Rising (BBB- rate)
Equity dilution
High

Natural Monopoly Analysis

Oracle is a NATURAL MONOPOLY in enterprise databases — dominates through 40+ years of customer lock-in, proprietary features, and ecosystem depth. Migration cost exceeds any savings from alternatives. However, FINANCING STRATEGY introduces systemic fragility.

Evidence Integrity

18 CONFIRMED | 5 REPORTED | 9 INFERRED — All heavy-weight factors verified. Credit fragility prevents full ALCISTA classification.